On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote: > > I agree. D has it already by the way: > > Exp1 && Exp2;
Doesn't that evaluate to a bool rather than typeof(Exp1)? --bb
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote: > > I agree. D has it already by the way: > > Exp1 && Exp2;
Doesn't that evaluate to a bool rather than typeof(Exp1)? --bb