On 9/8/13 9:32 PM, Manu wrote:
On 8 September 2013 05:04, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com <mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com>> wrote:Recent threads here have made it pretty clear that VisualD is a critical piece of D infrastructure. (VisualD integrated D usage into Microsoft Visual Studio.) Andrei, myself and Rainer (VisualD's champion) are all in agreement on this. What do you think? How about the bugs? When I made the suggestion, other the obvious endorsement for the project, I imagined the most significant outcome would be making Visual-D's bug's first-class bugs as well. Giving good visibility of IDE bugs to all contributors gives the whole community a good sense of the health of this aspect of the ecosystem, even of they don't contribute to the IDE integration themselves...
I think we should use the D mainline bug flow for VisualD, effectively vaulting VisualD into a first-class component of the D language.
This opens the door to other projects as well - e.g. emacs and vim integration helpers.
Andrei
