On 9 September 2013 15:05, Andrei Alexandrescu < seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> On 9/8/13 9:32 PM, Manu wrote: > >> On 8 September 2013 05:04, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com >> <mailto:newshound2@**digitalmars.com <newshou...@digitalmars.com>>> >> wrote: >> >> Recent threads here have made it pretty clear that VisualD is a >> critical piece of D infrastructure. (VisualD integrated D usage into >> Microsoft Visual Studio.) >> >> Andrei, myself and Rainer (VisualD's champion) are all in agreement >> on this. >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> How about the bugs? >> When I made the suggestion, other the obvious endorsement for the >> project, I imagined the most significant outcome would be making >> Visual-D's bug's first-class bugs as well. >> Giving good visibility of IDE bugs to all contributors gives the whole >> community a good sense of the health of this aspect of the ecosystem, >> even of they don't contribute to the IDE integration themselves... >> > > I think we should use the D mainline bug flow for VisualD, effectively > vaulting VisualD into a first-class component of the D language. > > This opens the door to other projects as well - e.g. emacs and vim > integration helpers. Perfect! I'm super happy you agree with me for once! :)
