Lutger wrote:
Tom S wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
(snip)
IMHO, the Tango vs. Phobos licensing issue is the biggest bikeshed color
problem in the D realm and the only people that can solve it are the
tango devs and walter and co. of which Neither are willing to budge.
Uhhh... try listening to Tango folks sometimes. They really have tried.
If you can forgive my ignorance, what is the current Tango/Phobos problem
you see and refer to here? Is it related to D1 or also concerns a possible
future Tango D2?
I'm mostly a Tango user, not its developer, so I might be misinformed,
but there doesn't seem to be any licensing issue except a conceptional
one. The bottom of the following thread has some info:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Any_chance_to_call_Tango_as_Extended_Standard_Library_82239.html
As for other issues - there's very little communication between the 'D
Team' and the 'Tango Team'. Much could be learned and borrowed from it,
but you don't see that in Phobos 2. Looks like we're going to end up
with two 'utility libraries' that are not compatible with one another
and instead of complementing each other, they offer ways to do the same
things in a slightly different manner.
IIRC, Tango devs claim that its runtime is better than druntime, which
also only supports DMD at the moment. And apparently, there's been very
little contact with Sean lately, so it's a case of 'us' vs 'them' again.
But that's just how I've subjectively received the topic so please take
it with a grain of salt.
--
Tomasz Stachowiak
http://h3.team0xf.com/
h3/h3r3tic on #D freenode
