On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:15:35AM +0200, deadalnix wrote: > On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 18:38:54 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > >Am 15.09.2013 19:20, schrieb Walter Bright: > >>On 9/15/2013 12:53 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > >>>What happened with Ddox? This looks like an improvement in both > >>>function and aesthetics: > >>> > >>>http://vibed.org/temp/phobos/std/array.html > >> > >>It doesn't document the parameters, return type, and doesn't > >>recognize embedded hyperlinks. > > > >Just as a reminder, this is the current version: > >http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/std/array.html > > I'm sold, that is awesome !
Me too. Why aren't we working towards that, instead of trying to cook up yet another hack on top of the current poor state of documentation? T -- The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners... -- Slashdotter