On 17/09/2013 15:48, eles wrote:
On Monday, 16 September 2013 at 15:52:26 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 13/09/2013 08:46, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 7 September 2013 at 19:05:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
It's not clear to me what any of these measures would help with.
Glad that you answered.
It will help with:
1) people already contributing to the D chains generally use
github, so they are familiar with the workflow, the interface,
the code-review etc. This will increase the probability to
contribute with a PR, even if for small glitches (or
documentation) in the beginning (BTW me, for one, I find the
interface on code.google to be awful at best, when compared to
github).
This is more of an issue of project hosting than whether it's officially
endorsed/listed or not. I could move the hosting of DDT from Google Code
to Github and potentially reap some of those benefits, regardless of
DLang endorsement or not. (In hindsight I do agree it might have been
better to have it hosted on Github. Google Code seems to have stagnated
a bit while Github is getting more popular and getting better - but
things were different when I switched away from DSource.org)
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
