On Sep 30, 2013 7:30 AM, "Jacob Carlborg" <d...@me.com> wrote: > > On 2013-09-30 00:07, David Nadlinger wrote: > >> … with the most irritating aspect being that DMD doesn't correctly >> implement va_copy on x86_64 (at least it didn't last time I checked), >> yet nobody seems to have noticed so far. > > > Perhaps it only matter when interfacing with C. Perhaps not that many people actually use varargs at all. I guess most people use variadic templates. They're easier to deal with. >
And they are @safe. :) Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
