On Monday, October 07, 2013 17:47:27 simendsjo wrote: > On Monday, 7 October 2013 at 13:29:30 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote: > > On Sunday, 6 October 2013 at 18:54:55 UTC, Dicebot wrote: > >> Any formal review may potentially result in short voting after > >> if no critical issues are found so I don't think it makes > >> sense in making any additional announcements. There are no > >> special points of attention - if review was declared and you > >> want to make some input, it should be done right there. > > > > Yes, but people are lazy. I don't talk about all of us, but > > most of people are lazy. > > Somebody of us will vote because it's interesting, but will not > > read/write review tread because it requests a time. > > So, additional announce of upcoming voting can help: "Guys, if > > you want to vote, it's time to read documentation and write > > your really cool idea before voting". > > This is the reason I've not cast any votes for standard modules - > I haven't had the time, or don't have the competence, to cast a > valid vote. It would be like voting for a political party without > knowing where all parties stands in all cases.
So, it would be like your typical political vote then. ;) - Jonathan m Davis