On Monday, 7 October 2013 at 15:36:23 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 at 10:49:58 UTC, John Colvin wrote:Then call it `experimental` instead of stdx. That's obvious (stdx sound like an extension of std library). I wonder if someone would complain that experimental module broke.
if nobody complains, then experimental would be useless: code could go directly into std.
