On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Walter Bright<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Without any way to sequence expressions in place, a lot of manipulation > becomes much more complicated. Comma expressions have been around a long > time, they work well, and are often used. Then why not, as someone else has suggested, use some kind of internal sequence node, maybe with an obscure keyword as the separator? It's just that the syntactic possibilities of the comma operator are too wonderful to ignore. It seems like such a waste of an operator for something that most people won't use in _human-generated_ code outside of for loop headers.
