On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Walter Bright<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: >> >> If it's internal to the parse tree can't you make the syntax whatever you >> want? >> Something like (expr1 __exprSequencer expr2) should do just fine, right? >> No reason it has to be a precious one-character symbol syntax. > > What if you're writing a program that generates D code?
If you're generating code which is so tricky that it needs to rely on comma expressions, then I doubt it will be something that users will be expected to read and/or edit. In which case, again, it doesn't matter how ugly the syntax is. "__exprSequencer" would do just fine. --bb