On 10 November 2013 10:33, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote: > On 2013-11-09 14:52, Marco Leise wrote: > > "dmd" and it's ilk (gdmd, ldmd2) have a known command line >> syntax, "dc" doesn't. Symlinks are most useful when the >> semantic stays the same. >> > > I might have been a bit unclear. I was thinking we had a symlink called > "dc" that would point to dmd, gdmd or ldmd2. I don't like that you can > invoke "dmd" and it will compile using GDC. > > It also makes no sense as both have wildly different compiler switch names. And for the switches that are the same, both interpret the switches differently. ie: '-I ./imports' works for GDC but not DMD (for some reason DMD doesn't like spaces between switches and switch arguments).
-- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';