On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Jarrett Billingsley<[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Unknown W. > Brackets<[email protected]> wrote: >> I have not read this entire topic, but what about the following: >> >> case 5, .., 9: > > I don't have a problem with the current syntax, but the mathematical > side of my brain squealed with fanboyish glee when it saw this. This > would be FANTASTIC.
Oh man, and it's even extensible and would mesh perfectly with the existing syntax: case 1, 3: // 1 or 3 case 5, .., 9: // 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 case 10, 12, .., 17, 19: 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19
