On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:50:29 Don wrote: > You shouldn't pay much attention to the length of the recent > release cycles. > The last two release cycles were abnormally long. Historically we > had a release about once a month, then that extended to two > months. In the last year the cycles became ridiculously long. > It's been completely unplanned. > > But ANY time period you choose would be better than the current > situation.
Hmmm. So, 7 years would be better? ;) In any case, we definitely should try and have more regular releases in the one to two month range rather than the really long gaps that we've been having lately. - Jonathan M Davis