On Tuesday, 3 December 2013 at 14:26:07 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
From the preceding discussion, it is clear that the community desires both a swift release cycle and more stability. No one solution will appease the entire community. Therefore, I will take the middle ground. The way forward will be as follows:

I support this. It is a good start and, if really needed and obvious, changes to the process could be performed later. But, it is quite nice and it is important to have it started.

I would vote for maximum automation of the building process (ideally, a single command that will build up everything in a single shot).


Tools currently included in the packages are as follows:

                RMDM

??? RDMD?

Should DUB be added, too?

Reply via email to