On 12/6/13 11:34 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
And again, notice that you are speaking about 'hypothetical advantages'
(language advantages) which implies two things:
1) current efficiency is worse when comparing with some benchmark
2) despite many years of development, community failed to realize these
advantages.
This makes me think that probably there is another reason of why code is
less efficient, for example fundamental characteristics of the language
make him hard to be quick. This is not bad per se, but saying that
language code can be faster than C, taking into account some many
problems with D, looks like advertisement, rather then technical
comparison.
That is not advertisement, and your tenor is dissonant in this forum.
This community, as pretty much any other languages', is looking for
strategic advantages compared to other languages, and how to exploit
them. It is perfectly natural to look for places where D semantics may
lead to better code and exploit those at their best.
D code is easy to make fast. This has been shown numerous times in
various contexts. There are also convenience features that are not aimed
at performance, bugs, and insufficiencies. Enumerating them in an
attempt to argue that D code is not or cannot be faster than C is
missing the point.
Andrei
