Robert Jacques wrote: > Well /* */ are excellent for toggling code sections. I tend to use > constructs such as // */ or //* or /*/ which allows me to turn on of off > blocks with often a single key stroke. Using /+ +/ means I have to Add > /++/ and remove /++/ each time I want to activate or deactivate a code > block.
Why? I believe that /++/ works exactly like /**/ in that regard. Doesn't it? //+ code that can be turned off by removing the first / //+/ -- Michiel Helvensteijn
