On Tuesday, 31 December 2013 at 02:28:45 UTC, Ritu wrote:
1. The ability to have a user-defined default constructor for structs. I believe this is not possible since it does not go well with D's metaprogramming.
If this is for a DSL, can't you make it so situations that lower to default construction use a function initializer? It would be completely opaque from the user's perspective. I don't think language details should ever be relevant to a DSL; it seems to me that you should always be able to work around it.
Sorry if this is impractical, I haven't read the thread super closely.
