Re: std.complex

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 23:54:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/26/2013 3:22 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
(It also leaves std.complex' behaviour incompatible with 
std::complex and other
library implementations, though I guess that's less of a 
concern so long as we
think what std.complex does is right.)

Making it behave differently than others would be a disaster.

Just as well that I was speaking hypothetically about things that 
_could_ be done, rather than _should_ be ... :-)