On 13 January 2014 02:37, Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org > wrote:
> On 1/12/14 2:49 AM, Peter Alexander wrote: > >> On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 02:11:18 UTC, Manu wrote: >> >>> But pure functions can (and do) return their arguments, and it's >>> obviously >>> not a 'strongly pure' function. So I just can't see how the assertion >>> that >>> it should be unique stands? >>> >> >> That's the bug. Your function isn't strongly pure, so the result >> shouldn't be convertible to immutable and isn't necessarily unique. Only >> strongly pure functions can have results convertible to immutable. >> > > Yep. Has this been placed in bugzilla? It's rather hi-pri. I wasn't sure if it was definitely a bug. Certainly seemed like one though. https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11908
