On 01/12/2014 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
...
Put $150 on this.
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325974-type-system-breaking-caused-by-implicit-conversion-for-the-value-returned-from-pure-function
Andrei
This issue was trivial, and yet was assigned a higher bounty than e.g.
fixing CTFE performance, which requires a large investment as far as I
understand. This raises the question of how bountied issues are
selected.
I select them with a focus on impact. Clearly the process could be
improved.
...
I see. FWIW it _did_ get an issue fixed.
There are other serious problems with the type system
implementation, eg:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9149
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10376
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9148
Thanks, will take those under advisement. FWIW there's been a thread
taking suggestions.
...
(I know; at that time I didn't think those issues would qualify. :o))
On a related note, I think it makes no sense to put a bounty on the
"Object not const-correct" issue. What would someone be required to do
in order to get the bounty for that issue?
Make sure we have a complete solution for invoking Object's methods
against const and immutable Objects?
Andrei
Wasn't there a consensus that Object's methods are going away?
