On Saturday, 25 January 2014 at 11:43:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 25 January 2014 at 10:15:30 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
If this works:
contains("hello", "el");
then this should work:
contains([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [2, 3]);
Special cases are pure evil. There's nothing special about
strings in this case.
I don't disagree, but naming and intuitive semantics should
match up. In this case it does not. "contains" signifies set
membership.
hasSequence/findSequence would be more appropriate
100% agree. The key thing is that it should be consistent between
strings and other range types.
