On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 14:27:42 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:15:28 -0000, Peter Alexander <peter.alexander...@gmail.com> wrote:
Special cases are pure evil. There's nothing special about strings in this case.

This is a tangent to my suggestion.

I am arguing for domain specific language (aliases) where sensible, not domain specific functions. If canFind can already handle all the desirable string cases, perfect, but lets alias it in std.string as "contains" so that people find what they expect to find first time and don't get frustrated looking for the correct generic name for the functionality they want.

There are likely other cases where we already have all the functionality in a nice generic function, but people struggle to find it because it has a suitably generic name.

I just want us to lower the bar for beginners coming from other languages like Java and C#.

R

I think that is a small short-term learning advantage but huge long-term damage for code readability. Now you suddenly need to not only remember what Phobos can do but also all defined aliases for that stuff.

What could have been awesome is to be able to define such aliases via DDOC so that IDE's can understand them and list in auto-completion, while still putting "real" name in source code. It would have solved discoverability issue without harming naming consistency.

Reply via email to