On 1/27/14 6:27 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:15:28 -0000, Peter Alexander
<peter.alexander...@gmail.com> wrote:
Special cases are pure evil. There's nothing special about strings in
this case.
This is a tangent to my suggestion.
I am arguing for domain specific language (aliases) where sensible, not
domain specific functions. If canFind can already handle all the
desirable string cases, perfect, but lets alias it in std.string as
"contains" so that people find what they expect to find first time and
don't get frustrated looking for the correct generic name for the
functionality they want.
There are likely other cases where we already have all the functionality
in a nice generic function, but people struggle to find it because it
has a suitably generic name.
I just want us to lower the bar for beginners coming from other
languages like Java and C#.
I just don't think this scales, though I understand it can sound
reasonable before it being tried.
Walter doesn't like writing libraries so when he first defined Phobos'
string support he simply took the string functions in Python and Ruby
and implemented them. That didn't work well at all, in spite of the
functions having the same names and semantics.
Andrei
