Lutger: > Adding random features to a language just because they look cool is a > terrible thing to do.
>Isn't this a bit contradictory?< I don't see a contradiction. For example list comprehensions and unit testing module aren't random features, they are known to be quite useful. >list comprehensions are only worth it if you add tuples imho.< Nope. Lazy/eager sequence comprehensions can be useful in many situations even if you don't have tuples. >Otherwise I think we can get by just fine with map/filter/reduce plus >extension methods.< Reduce is not intuitive. And a sequence comp is shorter and more readable (IF the syntax is really good) than most map/filter/xmap/xfilter. Bye, bearophile
