2014-02-17 22:33 GMT+09:00 Manu <turkey...@gmail.com>: > On 17 February 2014 16:18, Andrei Alexandrescu < > seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote: > >> On 2/16/14, 7:42 AM, Manu wrote: >> >>> So D offers great improvements to switch(), but there are a few small >>> things I wonder about. >>> >> >> TL;DR of my answer to this: at some point we must get used to the notion >> that minute syntax tweaks are always possible that make us feel we're >> making progress when instead we're just moving the rubble around. >> > > OT: Do you realise how harsh your posts often appear to people? I often > find I need to restrain myself when replying to your blunt dismissals of > peoples opinions/suggestions. > > So, you admit that this is a disaster site, but are reluctant to consider > what good may come of it? > I'm not suggesting to move the rubble around a bit, I'm suggesting a > missed opportunity to build something new and useful from the rubble. >
I completely agree with Andrei. We should continue to keep that D is the successor of the most used system languages - C and C++. it's a *huge* advantage against other modern languages. Kenji Hara
