"Manu" <turkey...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:mailman.156.1392649746.6445.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I agree, to an extent. That's why I say if it is to be improved, I guess it needs a newname.foreach eliminated almost all instances of for. I don't think anyone's upset aboutthat.
Exactly, foreach is a new, better language construct, but we didn't butcher for. I would love to see a nice solid proposal for 'match'.
