On 2/25/14, 10:58 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 23:17:56 UTC, Meta wrote:std.lexer could be the umbrella for a bunch of different lexers. Then we could have std.lexer.xml, std.lexer.json, etc.I think that's a bit backwards. I'd rather have std.d.lexer std.d.ast std.d.parser than std.lexer.d std.parser.d std.ast.d
I think we wouldn't want to add one more package for each language supported.
Andrei
