Re: Formal review of std.lexer

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2014-02-26 07:58, Brian Schott wrote:

I think that's a bit backwards. I'd rather have
std.d.lexer
std.d.ast
std.d.parser

than

std.lexer.d
std.parser.d
std.ast.d

I agree with Brian. Although I would have a common package for all 
languages:

std.language.d.lexer
std.language.d.ast
std.language.d.parser

--
/Jacob Carlborg