On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:55:17 +0200, Lutger wrote: > Sorry for the rant, I just think phobos as is developing is superior to > the .NET framework and has a much cooler name too :) Same goes for > Tango, albeit quite different design than phobos, it's very good too and > beats .NET hands down. Also, Tango has a better name.
Well, they both have only cool names. Reading the newsgroups shows that they are incomplete and buggy. I tried Tango a bit and at many places noticed problems. Phobos was ok last time I used it (two years ago), but I did simple stuff. Anyway I don't want to offend anyone here. I read that Andrei is redesigning Phobos and I am sure he will improve it. My point is however about having a meaningful library name. PS: please don't take anything in my post personally.
