On 13 March 2014 15:55, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> On 3/12/2014 10:15 PM, Manu wrote: > >> You're seriously comparing a deprecation warning telling you to write >> 'virtual' >> infront of virtuals to the migration from D1 to D2? >> > > You're talking about changing practically every D class in existence. > Only base classes, and only functions that are actually overridden. I don't want to raise 'override' again, but we know precisely the magnitude this change would affect users; significantly less than that. (The D1 => D2 transition also came with plenty of compiler warnings help.) > But the scale of changes required was extremely drastic, and non-trivial in aggregate. That's not comparable to "put this word here", which is what we're talking about.