Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu escribió:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Thanks. So it looks like get_property() and set_property() could
fly. How does that sound?
Not too much good. Among the simpler solutions there's the 'property'
attribute, that while not helping in reducing code (it makes code
longer!) solves most problems, while being simple. It's the minimal
solution that I think will work/fly.
We can't throw keywords at problems like they're getting out of style.
I've noticed that here every little problem gets solved by a little
keyword. If not, some arcane new syntax. Nobody seems to care about
rewriting, which I think is best.
So what do you think about introducing attributes? Not only it will help
not introducing new keyword, but it'll also *reduce* the amount of
keywords that exist right now.
Attributes would be great, but you guys should stop asking me what I
think and ask Walter. I seem to vaguely recall Walter isn't very excited
about attributes.
Andrei
