Jarrett Billingsley wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Ary Borenszweig<a...@esperanto.org.ar> wrote: >> auto a = x; // OK >> auto a = x(); // Wrong >> x = 2; // OK >> x(2); // Wrong > > And furthermore, I mentioned that &obj.foo would always get the > address of the member 'foo' from 'obj', even if 'foo' was a property.
That's the part of this proposal I don't like. The getter of a property is not the property itself, and should not have the same name. It's confusing that '&x.y' is a delegate but 'x.y' is not a method. In short, this proposal fails to fix the conceptual problem with the way properties are handled in D right now. -- Rainer Deyke - rain...@eldwood.com
