On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
>> Of course they're overridable. They are *functions*. > > Then why are you calling them properties? :o) Stop deliberately misunderstanding me. >> So let me get this straight: the property attribute would be better >> technically, but let's not throw more keywords at it; so instead we suggest >> attributes, but no, they don't have any useful purpose. >> >> WHAT. > > I didn't say that. Whatever. Have fun designing your own language, Andrei. Must be nice.
