On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 11:35:32 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 11:09:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 10/06/14 10:12, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
But yes, it's definitely not what you want to have for D. I'm
not sure
how much can be done about that, though - except from
rewriting the CTFE
engine with performance in mind (maybe even using a JIT
compiler). Or
maybe it's possible to be more liberal with algorithmic
optimizations
when the CTFE memory usage brought to a reasonable level.
Can the templates be compiled in a separate phase, not using
CTFE but as a regular compiler?
Or, just like ctRegx vs regx, can we have a runtime version of
diet template that runs slower but doesn't need to compile? It
would be great for development phase.
We can't because Diet templates may contain arbitrary D code
inline.
