On 03/07/2014 10:40 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 17:34:46 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 11:02:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
We don't have any recognizable branding worth fighting for. I can't
even remember how current D logo looks like without checking the
website, it is just some image in the corner of the page. "Branding"
is something bigger than that.
But you recognise it when you see it!
I recognize the updated one too. Actually I won't be able to tell the
difference unless looking at both at the same time.
My point is that there is nothing very distinctive with current logo to
be that concerned. Anything with similarly styled "D" letter will be as
recognizable as current one.
I agree!
I started working on this little document last night while angry and
tired, maybe it should find its way to the wiki.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sb4xnZUbzVRIicsfnxBFhTvRH4EOYq88wZexAuGcnaE/edit
Its the last time I'm going to post any work related to D branding or
logo design unless someone specifically asks me to.
A...
