Am Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:50:12 -0700 schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org>:
> On 7/10/14, 7:54 AM, Dicebot wrote: > >> E.g. > > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1527 is some > > apparently work that's just sitting there abandoned. > > > > Hm, slightly OT: is it considered widely acceptable to take over > > such pull requests by reopening rebased one with identical content? > > I presume Boost licensing implies so but not sure everyone else > > expects the same. > > That's totally on topic! I think it's fair game to take over pull > requests of which authors did not respond to repeated pings. -- Andrei I agree, but it's probably a good idea to keep the author name in the git history. In git author/committer can be different, see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18750808/difference-between-author-and-committer-in-git