On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 13:10:35 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
Serious question: what exactly is "supplemental documentation"?
In my view, if it's good enough to be considered
documentation, it belongs in the documentation. Anything else
is just pussy-footing around.
For example articles that explain a concept in more detail than
is suitable for the documentation, things like
http://dlang.org/d-array-article.html for instance. But I think
these are better placed into the wiki, and linked from the
documentation.
