On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 13:10:35 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
Serious question: what exactly is "supplemental documentation"?In my view, if it's good enough to be considered documentation, it belongs in the documentation.
It belongs, but it's not there.
- discuss disqus Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqus Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqus Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqus Wyatt via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqu... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqu... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqu... Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss ... Wyatt via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss ... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqu... Jakob Ovrum via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqus Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqus w0rp via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqus Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqus Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss disqu... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: discuss ... Klaim - Joël Lamotte via Digitalmars-d
