On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 18:02:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
basically "s++" gets translated to "s.x++", and since S behaves
basically identically to an int, which means it should get
enregistered under the same circumstances, the generated machine
code should be identical to when you wrote "int" instead of "S".
Oh, neat. I stand corrected on that point. Thanks.
I don't see why this should have any effect on the cache.
That's my mistake; I thought there was overhead for structs in D.
Should have done my homework!
It's too bad this does nothing for the usability issues. :/
-Wyatt
