Am Fri, 19 Sep 2014 05:53:00 +0000 schrieb "bearophile" <bearophileh...@lycos.com>:
> Andrei Alexandrescu: > > > Wyatt: > >> (I wouldn't consider the cookie parameter a better solution; I > >> would consider it a wart.) > > > > That's the right solution. > > The cookie parameter is a ugly wart. > > Bye, > bearophile We should probably revert to having real typedefs. I find myself not using Typedef either. Instead I use wrapper structs with alias this, because they fit the shoe much better by introducing a unique symbol in a straight forward way :) Rationale Typedef is not flexible enough to cover all use cases. This is better done with a language solution. -- Marco