On 9/20/14, 9:32 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:25:17 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>
wrote:

I think this is an entirely palatable idiom:
alias ALfloat = std.typecons.Typedef!(float, "ALfloat");
this is ugly.

But not unusable.

even if we remove "std.typecons." it's still ugly. making
such core feature ugly is the right way to marginalize it. "what? all
this uglyness only for simple typedef? screw it, i'll go with simple
`alias ALfloat = float;`! oh, wait... this gives me nothing and i
already messed some declarations... ah, screw it, will use `float`
then!"

Are you saying you're giving up on an entire design because you can't bring yourself to type one string?

the whole thing with aliasing Typedef is broken.

s/broken/less convenient than a builtin/ and we agree.

yes, it's smart to use
library for this (see, our language is THAT powerful!), but it's uuugly.

uuugly != broken

the same thing as with octal literals: we have 0b, we have 0x, yet it's
very smart to banish octals to phobos and use octal!"660" instead of
logical 0o660. phew.

but i know: octal literals are handy, so they will never make their way
to mainline. "typedef" construct is handy, so...

Not sure I understand this last point. At any rate, if your entire line of reasoning hinges on you being unwilling to type a few more characters to have a workable solution, I have difficulty taking it seriously.


Andrei

Reply via email to