On Saturday, 4 October 2014 at 05:02:04 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 04:36:48 +0000
eles via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> sorry. i meant that compiler WILL be in unknown state if it
> will
> continute to processing invalid source. that's why it should
> stop right
> after the first error.
No. It might produce an invalid product. Just like a real
engineer could produce a flawed product on the basis of wrong
designs.
i can't see any sane reason to process garbage data, 'cause
result is
known to be garbage too.
The same reason why a schoolteacher will process garbage exam
sheets.
