On Sunday, 16 November 2014 at 22:18:51 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:09:00 +0000
via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Sunday, 16 November 2014 at 22:00:10 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> that's why warp is faster than cpp? ;-)
Which implementation of cpp?
gcc implementation, afair. it's slowness was the reason for
warping.
Ok, I haven't seen an independent benchmark, but I believe clang
is faster. But…
https://github.com/facebook/warp/blob/master/lexer.d#L173
PITA. the only sane way to write a good lexer is working with
structure
which emulates D string and slicing (if we must parse text from
in-memory buffer, of course).
Nah, if you know that the file ends with zero then you can build
an efficient finite automata as a classifier.
