Remember that the alternative to zero-terminated strings at that
time was to have 2 string types, one with a one byte length and
one with a larger length. So I think C made the right choice for
it's time, to have a single string type without a length.
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Why is `scope` planned for deprecation... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d