On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:03:42 +0000 Kagamin via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 08:46:49 UTC, bearophile wrote: > > Freddy: > > > >> Why not keep size_t implictly convertable but disallow it for > >> usize. > > > > This is an interesting idea. (But the name "uword" seems > > better). > > > > Bye, > > bearophile > > As a legacy from 16-bit era word is ushort. > I use intp and uintp. i think that `intp` and `uintp` is very good. a little hard to read maybe (too similar to `int` and `uint`).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
