On 12/30/14 10:19 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 05:45:08PM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 12/29/14 3:47 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:12:54PM +0000, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Monday, 29 December 2014 at 23:11:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
$(TROW all , `all!"a > 0"([1, 2, 3, 4])` returns `true` )
Would that still work if the first column was something like (0,0) -
including a comma?
I've advocated nicer macros before, ddoc's recursive expansion makes
for a lot of nice options, but the comma being a separator kinda
worries me.
We've already had to resort to $(COMMA) hacks to work around comma
issues in Phobos docs. :-(
That's to be expected from any macro system.
Not to mention that as it stands, ddoc is only really convenient for
HTML output; while it's certainly *possible* to target it for non-HTML
output, it's a pain. Take LaTeX, for example.
I have successfully generated LaTeX from dlang.org and phobos.
Of what quality?
Excellent.
Have you actually looked at the LaTeX output to see if
it's actually correct?
Of course.
I doubt it's actually 100% correct.
It is. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/736.
Destroyed?
Andrei
