On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:43:56 -0800 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 12/29/2014 6:37 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: > > it's great that Ddoc is good for making books. but it's not so great > > that it's bad for documenting source code. > > I also use it for all the documentation on the Digital Mars site, which > include > a lot of coding examples, the articles I wrote for Dr. Dobb's about code, all > the documentation on walterbright.com, etc. yes, that's exactly why it's not so great for documenting source code. you basically invented your own TeX, which has alot of features to write stand-alone texts, but almost completely unreadable as a source code documentation without preprocessor. Ddoc is just too powerful.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
