On 1/1/15 1:34 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
i can fix something if i can read it, and i can't read that Ddoc mess.
so i'm going to dlang.org to look at the dox instead of looking it
right in the Phobos sources. and if i see something that can/should be
fixed on dlang.org... ah, well, i have to drop the thing i was doing,
open another terminal, go to Phobos source directory, find the file
with the dox, then find the place to fix... screw it, i was looking at
documentation for doing completely different things!
but see, if Phobos documentation is human-readable without
preprocessing, it's WAY EASIER for me to just open Phobos source file
and look there. and guess what i'll do if i'll see that something needs
fixing there? yep, i'll fix that, 'cause i'm already at the place that
needs fixing. the process is not distractive. and then i can do 'git
diff' and send a patch.
All you need is a mail client seeing as Walter offered you twice to
email him any fixes you have and he'll integrate them for you. (Not to
mention you refuse to use github etc.) Honestly if someone would pass
similarly constructed arguments by you, would you put any weight on
their opinion? I find your posts oddly awesome. Such cognitive
dissonance is the stuff of legends. -- Andrei
