On 1/01/2015 1:54 p.m., ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 13:44:23 +1300
Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
I was thinking one simpler.
$(D myfunction, $0)
it's not really better than current Ddoc. sure, you can use it to write
custom doc processor, but you can't store state with it, and you still
have to escape alot. this actually making Ddoc *worse*, as it adds
complexity.
At the very least, atleast the compiler wouldn't need changes per each
different doc processor.
I can understand state being an issue. But this atleast will use CTFE to
extend DDOC just enough to make it more useful.
For full AST access which basically has state local to the function, its
too much code on the compiler side to make it worth while right now. But
this is a nice compromise IMO.
